Blunt wraps or simply "Blunts"
have been around for a few years. Their origin can be traced to the alternate
"herbal" market sector which includes some head shops - yes, there are a few
left. Before there were actual manufacturers of these tobacco by-product wrappers, users
would seek out cheap grocery store cigars, split the outer tobacco wrapper, throw away the innards and roll whatever was their pleasure inside.
This practice was almost never enjoyed by tobacco users with most folks using this
technique for smoking herbs of all kinds both legal and illicit. There are at least a
dozen or so manufacturers of these newer products as of this writing but the viability of
the blunt market, particularly as it addresses tobacco use, is not yet quite clear. In
fact, most within the tobacco industry consider them to almost never be used for tobacco.
We felt that such beliefs were a bit premature and decided to see for ourselves the
possibilities and practicalities of these increasingly popular wrappers. We emphasize popular
because it is necessary to understand the economics of small tobacco retail shops in order
to accurately evaluate this category. The fact is that most small shops are sorely tempted
to sell glass pipes, screens, and many other "alternative" market items in order
to service the wide audience these things attract and to bolster sagging profits due to
excessive state tobacco taxation. Small
shops, especially in high tobacco tax states simply cannot make enough profit on tobacco
alone. Hence given the growing popularity of blunts, we felt it time to test some and see
if they really do make a reasonably legitimate fit in the tobacco store environment. Now
before we go further, most of what follows immediately is of a personal nature but I think
necessary to this discussion.
Back in the 60's and
70's when I smoked a variety of herbs - hell, lets call a spade a spade, - POT, I would
never have considered mixing tobacco with that substance. The two just don't go well
together and a tobacco wrapped joint seemed plainly distasteful to
me. The quality and hence strength of grass way back then was nowhere near as robust as
that available today, so while a large stick might have been more of a necessity then,
than today, larger papers regardless of what they were made from, were still seldom the
answer for me. Also, the incredibly powerful strains available today are expensive and the
idea of rolling up $50 worth of herb in one stick, for a bunch of friends who already
can't find their ass with both hands, seems ludicrous. Simply, I guess I just don't get
the aesthetic attraction or the economic viability of such methods.
However some of the blunts
we tested with TOBACCO actually provided a pretty nice smoking
experience. I no longer smoke the devil weed, not because I am particularly against its
use, but I simply cannot tolerate the effects as they relate to my ability to function
intellectually. In fact, though I believe that legalization of marijuana might have some
positive ramifications, especially in terms of tax revenue dogma, I do know too many
younger people who use it much too often and consequently spend too little time with more
creative, productive activities. (It seems for some to have much the same reality numbing
effect as TV and video games). This should be, as adults, their choice however, and as is
always important to this magazine, we should emphasize here our dislike of government's
propensity to regulate our personal behavior especially when it affects only ourselves. In
much the same way that we disagree with glass pipes being
classified as drug paraphernalia based solely on the material from which they are
constructed, we feel that, if blunts can be shown to provide an enhanced tobacco smoking
experience, their use for other activities should effectively be deemed irrelevant. After
all, you can smoke illicit and even dangerous substances in a briar tobacco pipe or ANY
rolling paper or in rolled up tin foil for that matter. Some truly legitimate rolling
paper products that contain varying degrees of tobacco have already found a significant tobacco user audience. We have reviewed both
Golden Wraps from Republic Tobacco and Brownies
and found them to be pleasurable media for tobacco rolling especially if you are looking
for a little stronger, more cigarillo-like smoking experience.
Now there is one other
issue we would like to address before we actually share with you what we found when using
blunts for tobacco use. That is: How are these thing going to be taxed?
We have talked with a number of state revenue departments on this issue and the consensus
is that in most cases if a product contains tobacco, no matter what percentage, it
qualifies for a state tobacco tax levy. The actual constituent tobacco percentage of all
of the blunts we tested is unclear. The packaging certainly gives one no indication of
degree of content other than stating that most are made from tobacco by-products. Only
Miami Blunts are said to be made from pure tobacco leaf. We did not find this leaf to be
of particularly high quality, certainly not like a "good" cigar wrapper
(Connecticut Shade or Broadleaf for instance) but nonetheless the wrapper was superior in
actual tobacco flavor from the other blunts tested. Randy's (of Randy's
Wired Papers) is planning on a true Connecticut Shade leaf blunt cut to 70-78mm to be
marketed very soon. When we receive this new product we will immediately update the
information here. Still there is no clear cut decision on how even these true 100% tobacco
wraps will be viewed by various state and federal revenue agencies. I suspect they will be
taxed along with and at the same rate as other tobacco products like rolling tobacco, or
pipe tobacco, or more likely, cigars. (Some states now have different tax schemes for
cigars).
The various blunt
manufacturers are making a pretty concerted effort to sell these things as a means to
making one's own cigarillo/cigars, but we have yet to find any blunt rolled with even
great tobacco to even come close to duplicating the pleasure that even an economy grade
tobacco shop cigar can provide. Having said that, the experience is, in all fairness,
quite different as when the blunt is filled with a good cigarette tobacco, one can inhale
and enjoy the tobacco flavor quite nicely. Of course this depends to a large degree on
which blunt you choose and it is this subject that we will expand on during the remainder
of this article.
There are many characteristic one might look for in the ideal blunt
for rolling tobacco, but with the obvious exception of flavor quality, we found that the
thinner the blunt, the better the experience. This is based mostly on the fact that
thinner blunts lend themselves well to rolling in a hand rolling machine and thus are more
effective in creating a very consistent, professional looking smoke. This consistency in
the stick is of special import as it enhances the flavor and smoking continuity to such
a point that the final product is in many ways superior to most cigarillo type
smokes. The Kardel blunt is our pick for the thinnest and finest for just
this kind of experience. Kardels come in a number of flavors but we found
the Vanilla and Wild Berry flavors to be the most satisfying. We're told (by a competitor)
that this brand has undergone a change in recent months and that the Kardel product used
to be a thicker wrap. We haven't seen the old ones so we can't confirm this but suffice it
to say that one of the things we have seen and heard from those who sell and use blunts
regularly (certainly more the we do) is that thicker blunts are more often more popular in
alternative smoke shop environs (head shops) and that many who use blunts for smoking
materials other than tobacco seem to prefer the thicker blunts. We will cover later in this
article such products but for now let's look closer at what can be accomplished with a
thin blunt like the Kardel. The graphic at left shows a finished stick rolled with this
thin wrap and the resulting product smoked quite nicely. There is a certain sweetness to
the stick and while the aroma of each particular flavor is not as apparent in the smoke,
the taste on the lips is quite pleasant. We did not notice any
particular strength added to the tobacco taste, not even as much as the Golden Wraps or
Brownies mentioned above. We did notice a somewhat "thicker" taste, in that the
flavor that did come through seemed to stick on the palette a little longer than a normal
paper, but in general, the very nice looking, easy to roll end product was quite enticing.
Kardels, though much the same size as other blunt wraps are, as stated
before, by far the thinnest. The dimensions in the graphic at right emphasize the
usefulness of this product with any 110 mm roller and the stick we created was done
successfully the first time. No blunts we tested had any gum and most come either
pre-moistened (some very much so) and wrapped in airtight packaging or need to be
moistened with a sponge (the more hardcore rollers are said to use their tongues) to make
the roll adhesive enough to stay together. The thinner blunts seemed to need gum less than
the thicker ones but many we talked to claimed they had no problem getting any of the
blunts in this review to stay together. Again there are those who are more experienced
with this rolling media than admittedly, are we.
The other end of the
blunt spectrum comes with the definitely and purposefully controversial name of 420.
Now the term 420 has been part of the pot scene for quite a few years and is speculated to
come from the police call code for a drug bust. After examining many sites that use the
term and attempt to define its origin, we found that no direct relationship exists to any
one definition for this code word and, like most urban legends, there are a number of
claimants to first use. What is pertinent here is that 420 IS a buzzword for pot and as
such, products with this kind of name beg to be viewed as paraphernalia. The blunt itself
is a double thickness one and is not easy to use with tobacco.
However we found it to be pretty popular among the alternative market shops who we
contacted for just such information. The plain (natural) and Honey flavor are the most
popular. We are told a name change is in the works but have no date as yet that this will
become fact. We must note however that this blunt when lit empty (no tobacco inside) and
puffed on did give off a pretty nice tobacco aroma. The most popular
blunt we tested was the Royal Blunt shown at right. The flavor,
especially the Strawberry, was so good that we enjoyed just holding them in our mouths.
Not as thick as the 420 they are still much thicker than the Kardel, which by the way is
felt by many who are frequent users of blunts in the alternative market, to be too
sheer. I must admit the Royal is of exceptional flavor and very well
made. They come in single packs with a small clear plastic straw that is likely used to
keep the blunt in a rolled up configuration until ready to use. We could find no other use
(well, hardly any) for the straw so we are assuming this purpose to be the most logical.
Once moistened (a lot) with a sponge the Royal did become pliable enough to roll with a
hand roller and while the stick hung together pretty well, the flavor added to the tobacco
inside was much more imposing. The few we gave out to folks for testing seemed to like the
natural flavor best but as stated, the strawberry was downright yummy, just not
particularly great for tobacco filled sticks (in our opinion only of course).
And the last blunt we
looked at (though there are a number of others most are similar to this last category) was
the 3-In-One. It is of medium thickness and comes in a
variety of flavors. Again the thickness (which makes it desirable for the alternative
market) was not an advantage for rolling tobacco. If moistened enough however a pretty
good stick resulted but the sheer volume of blunt paper-vs-tobacco ratio left little of
the taste of the cigarette tobacco we used. The 3-In-One comes as advertised with 3
blunts (shown at right) rolled up in each cellophane package. They are a good bargain with
3 blunts for basically the price of one, but for which market this item will gain an
advantage, still remains to be seen.
Lastly we would like to introduce you to a product that, though not
strictly defined as a blunt, was by far the biggest hit with our tobacco customers and
even though it is more than a little unusual, it is nonetheless delicious. I speak of Amico
Sweet Palm Wraps. Now whether this is a head toy or a tobacco wrap by intent, the
efficacy of this item with tobacco is undeniable. We have yet to taste ANYTHING as yummy
as this premade hollow tube. It is a very sweet palm (no tobacco here)
leaf with an exotic, almost pineapple taste (they call it sweet Jamaican rum) and comes
pre-formed with a little wooden stick for poking your favorite tobacco into the tube. This
is accomplished rather easily though it does take a little time. But I assure you the time
is well spent as the resulting smoke is again, sweet and exotic, and works especially well with
halfzware type tobaccos. The stick tastes so good many who tried them simply liked to keep
them stuck in their mouth adding no tobacco at all. Perhaps this will become an ideal way
to quit smoking as it certainly satisfies the oral fixation element. The end is plugged
with a porous woody substance, (lower left -
probably palm bark) that one can draw smoke easily through and provides a good chomping
bit for those who simply want to hold it in their teeth and suck on the stick. The wrap
itself is about 120 mm long and about the diameter of a small petite corona cigar (about
38 ring gauge). They come five to a pack with a poking stick. If you are looking for a
unique smoking experience, we recommend them highly. They smell so good they could be used
as car air fresheners to the delight of all occupants.
Which brings us back
to the initial thrust of this article which is that retail tobacco shops are going to
attract many customers who are looking for supplies other than "traditional"
tobacco, pipes and cigars. That doesn't mean you have to become a "head" shop, but don't dismiss
out-of-hand the possibilities for profit provided by certain products that have many
legitimate uses just because some users find some not so legitimate uses for them. Chances
are, the customer looking for these alternatives is also a tobacco user and there is no
reason to lose their possible business for tobacco supplies and have them go down the
street where they can find the alternatives along with usually inferior, higher priced
tobacco products as well.
One test we applied to
many of the products reviewed in this issue (scales, blunts, etc.) was that their sale be
reserved for our tobacco customers who had established a pattern of loyal patronage for
our more traditional tobacco items. Tobacco users like to experiment as much as anyone and
some or even many products normally viewed as headshop items have a very legitimate
tobacco use. AND . . . many of these products can help make the difference between a
profitable tobacco business and yet another failure.
If you have a rolling
paper that we have missed (there are probably quite a few) and that you feel is worthy of
a review, let us know. If you are a manufacturer of such a paper, send us some. We don't
pretend to know everything and are daily and gratefully surprised by new items. Go to our Contact
page and email, write, or send us your samples. We value our readers for the incredible
resource that they are. - the ed.
Each issue we are increasingly gratified at the emergence of new,
exciting products of innovative design and packaging. After all, as the RYO/MYO market
grows it is these interesting products that exhibit some flair and style that will help
their entry into the mainstream of tobacco enthusiasts. However, as we made note of above,
the pricing of rolling papers in the US is becoming somewhat of an issue with our readers
and even some distributors. We hear more and more that prices in other countries are
substantially lower than those charged for the same products in the US. We hope this
situation is not a long term problem and has a reasonable and legal (non anti-trust)
explanation. We will cover in a future issue more of what we are able to determine as to
the reasons for this apparent and potentially disturbing anomaly. - Doug
See ya next time - RYO |